Legal Opinion
Southworth v. SmithKline . . .
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided July 16, 1996No. CV-95-447-SDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Southworth v. SmithKline . . . CV-95-447-SD 07/16/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Janice Southworth; Gregory Southworth v. Civil No. 95-447- SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals O R D E R Before the court are the issues raised by certain pending motions. 1. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery, document 7 This motion seeks production by defendant of a vial of defendant's vaccine from Lot No. 989A4. Defendant objects. Document ll.1 The litigation involves a claim by plaintiff Janice Southworth that her vaccination with defendant's hepatitis B vaccine, Engerix…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.