Legal Opinion
In re Care and Treatment of Saiz
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided May 14, 2021No. 122627PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
No. 122,627 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of MAX R. SAIZ. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A court has the inherent authority to enter sanctions that are reasonably necessary for the administration of justice so long as the sanctions are not inconsistent with the relevant statutes. 2. Since 1897, courts in Kansas have also had the statutory authority to find someone in contempt of court. K.S.A. 20-1201 et seq. A court may sanction the failure to comply with an order in a civil case through the indirect contempt of court procedure set out in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Biglow v. EidenbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Detention of Stewart Franklin SchumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024
- In Re Detention of Stewart Franklin SchumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2024