Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Volpe

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 27, 1969No. 69-C-302PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

This action is before the court for determination of a motion for preliminary injunction by the plaintiff and seven motions by certain of the defendants.

The defendants’ motions are as follows:

1. To. dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for failure to plead short, concise statements under rules 8(a) and 41(b).

2. To strike paragraphs 17, 18, and 19 from the complaint.

3. To strike plaintiffs’ exhibits B and C attached to the complaint.

4. To dismiss the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hassett v. Weissman (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. Pain Prevention Lab, Inc. v. Electronic Waveform Labs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  3. Clinton Community Hospital Corp. v. Southern Maryland Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  4. Amini Innovation Corp. v. McFerran Home Furnishings, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  5. Lewis v. BrinegarDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API