Legal Opinion

State v. Muse

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1998PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Special Justice.

This case presents for review the appeal by the defendant, Gregory Muse, from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the conviction of aggravated assault. Permission to appeal was granted in order to decide if the defendant is entitled to a new trial because the jury was selected in his absence and without his knowledge. The Court finds that the defendant had a fundamental constitutional right to be present during voir dire, that he did not waive that right, and that his absence during the entire jury selection process is not subject to harmless…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. House v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. George Crutcher, Hampton C. Hazel, Also Known as Robert Jones, and John PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Team Design v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  4. State v. BlackmonTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. WalshHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API