State v. Blackmon
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRCH, J.
We granted permission to appeal pursuant to Tenn. R.App. P. 11 to the appellant, Bobby Vincent Blackmon, in order to determine whether, and if so, under what circumstances, the right to be tried by a judge who is constitutionally qualified 1 can be waived. We address also the appellant’s contention that the judgment of forfeiture entered against his vehicle seized incident to his arrest on April 20, 1993, constitutes “punishment,” such as would violate the constitutional prohibitions 2 against double jeopardy.
Following a careful consideration of the issues, we conclude that a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Lane v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MellonTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Eddie C. Pratcher, Jr. v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Team Design v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.