Legal Opinion

State v. Blackmon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1998No. 01S01-9709-CR-00187PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, J.

We granted permission to appeal pursuant to Tenn. R.App. P. 11 to the appellant, Bobby Vincent Blackmon, in order to determine whether, and if so, under what circumstances, the right to be tried by a judge who is constitutionally qualified 1 can be waived. We address also the appellant’s contention that the judgment of forfeiture entered against his vehicle seized incident to his arrest on April 20, 1993, constitutes “punishment,” such as would violate the constitutional prohibitions 2 against double jeopardy.

Following a careful consideration of the issues, we conclude that a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. State v. MacKeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lane v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. MellonTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Eddie C. Pratcher, Jr. v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Team Design v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API