Legal Opinion

People v. Keenan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1991No. A046309PublishedCited by 20 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

Appellant Jeffrey Adam Keenan appeals following his conviction of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), forcible sodomy (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (c)), mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203), false imprisonment (Pen. Code, § 236), assault with force (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)), attempted burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 664/459) and attempted rape (Pen. Code, §§ 664/261, subd. (2)). He contends (1) his confession was improperly obtained and involuntarily given; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for mayhem; (3) the court chose the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Perkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. Earl CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. People v. PittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. SantanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. AUSBIECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API