Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Gooding

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 24, 2003No. 02-5891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Steve W. Rogers (“Rogers”) appeals the grant of Defendant-Appellee Harold Gooding’s (“Gooding”) motion for summary judgment in this case. Rogers brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“ § 1983”) against Gooding, a Tennessee Highway Patrol Officer, who Rogers claims used excessive force against him during a tax protest at the Tennessee State Capitol on July 12, 2001. Gooding filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that he was entitled to qualified immunity as a mater of law. The district *474court granted Gooding’s motion. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William Fowler v. Steve BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Willis v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Fiordalisi v. ZubekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  4. Connie Reguli v. Tracy HetzelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
  5. Reguli v. HetzelDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API