Rogers v. Gooding
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Steve W. Rogers (“Rogers”) appeals the grant of Defendant-Appellee Harold Gooding’s (“Gooding”) motion for summary judgment in this case. Rogers brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“ § 1983”) against Gooding, a Tennessee Highway Patrol Officer, who Rogers claims used excessive force against him during a tax protest at the Tennessee State Capitol on July 12, 2001. Gooding filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that he was entitled to qualified immunity as a mater of law. The district *474court granted Gooding’s motion. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- William Fowler v. Steve BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Willis v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Fiordalisi v. ZubekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Connie Reguli v. Tracy HetzelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
- Reguli v. HetzelDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.