Legal Opinion
Gross v. Delaney
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 1943No. 123PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Suit was brought by appellee as endorsee and holder of promissory notes executed by appellant. The defense was that plaintiff was not a bona fide holder for value. After trial by the court, without a jury, judgment was entered against appellant for the amount of the notes with interest.
The evidence was that appellant had employed one Redman to perform certain electric, tile ánd carpenter work. On August 23, 1941, he gave Redman a negotiable note for $153.50, payable without interest in sixty days. Oh the margin was a notation: “For complete electric work 4543 Grant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Interstate Bankers Corp. v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- McReynolds v. National Woodworking Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1928
- Sheriger v. GrunerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hutchins v. LangleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fabrizio v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Russell v. Universal Acceptance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965