Legal Opinion
Fabrizio v. Anderson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1948No. 695PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Fabrizio sued Anderson and Maccarone on a promissory note made by them to Frishman and endorsed by him to Fabrizio. Frishman was brought in as a third-party defendant by Anderson and Maccarone, and Fabrizio by amendment to his complaint added Frishman as a defendant. The trial court awarded Fabrizio judgment against Frishman but denied recovery against the makers of the note. Fabrizio has appealed from the judgment in favor of Anderson and Maccarone.
The important question presented is whether the record discloses a basis for a finding by the trial court, sitting without…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Bankers Corp. v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. HenryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Thal v. Credit Alliance Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Thal v. Credit Alliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Brewer v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Securities Corporation v. FranklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Myron O'Neal Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. KavlickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Wilson v. GordenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Russell v. Universal Acceptance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.