Legal Opinion
In re Kaplan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 20, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*34OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 30, 2004, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law as a result of his being found guilty of a serious crime, and continuing until further order of this Court, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), and he was directed to immediately apprise the Court upon being sentenced (see Matter of Delany, 87 NY2d 508 [1996]).
The petitioner had previously apprised the Court that on April 19, 2004, the respondent was found guilty, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of DelanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re SinkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re PasternakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of LivotiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of CvjeticaninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.