Legal Opinion

Swart v. Rural Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 26, 1984No. 83-223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Appellant Jeffrey Swart appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his complaint. The issue *480is whether appellant was a “dependent relative” of his parents when he was injured, thereby precluding coverage under their farm liability insurance policy. We affirm the judgment.

Appellant graduated from high school in the spring of 1979. That summer, he lived with his parents and worked twenty to twenty-five hours per week at a restaurant, earning approximately $900. He also worked on his parents’ farm forty to forty-five hours each month and was paid $3.00 per hour. He became 18 on August 13. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Commercial Discount Corp. v. Milwaukee Western BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reserve Life Insurance v. La FolletteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Heinz Plastic Mold Co. v. Continental Tool Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Employers Health Insurance v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Damore v. Winnebago Park Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Progressive Northern Insurance v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  4. Damore v. Winnebago Park AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Swart v. Rural Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API