Briggs v. . Boyd
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The exception taken by the defendants' counsel to the legal conclusion of the referee, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover of the defendants the sum of $532.62, raises the question whether the plaintiffs were entitled to recover this entire sum, and, if not so entitled, the General Term committed no error in reversing the judgment and ordering a new trial.
The defendants had in their hands a quantity of whisky belonging to the plaintiffs, which the…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Deshong v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- In re the Estate of WeltonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- Fargusson v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Hyams v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.