Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Cicioni
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
This is an appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which determined that neither a referee nor the Board itself has authority under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Com*382pensation Act1 (Act) to decide a controversy between an employer and Ms insurance carrier over the alleged cancellation of the employer’s policy.
After a hearing on a workmen’s compensation claim petition filed by one of the appellant’s employes, the referee had ordered the Eockwood Insurance Company (Eockwood) to pay compensation to the employe. Eockwood appealed tMs decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Nilsson v. Nepi Brothers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Eldridge v. Blue Ridge Tex. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Adams v. BrandonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3Cited by10 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ertz v. Glen Nan, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Rockwood Insurance v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Felmont Oil Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Travelers Insurance v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.