Legal Opinion

Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Groat, J.

Motion by defendant to set aside and vacate the service of the summons and complaint herein on the grounds (a) that the defendant, a foreign corporation, was not doing business within the State of New York and (b) that the defendant was not served with process herein in that Carolyn Lawrence, the person served with process, was not one upon whom such service could properly be made under section 229 of the Civil Practice Act.

The defendant is a Rhode Island corporation which has not filed a qualifying certificate in New York under the General Corporation Law. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meinhard, Greeff & Co. v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Pittsburg & Shawmut Coal Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1922
  3. Cunningham v. Mellin's Food Co.New York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API