Pittsburg & Shawmut Coal Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Claim on express contract.
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The claimant is a Pennsylvania stock corporation. On April 1,1918, the state superintendent of prisons delivered to it a communication stating in substance that he had appointed it his agent to purchase for the prison department approximately 24,000 tons of bituminous coal, during the ensuing year, at the prices and subject to the regulations of the United States fuel administration, the claimant to receive a commission of fifteen cents per ton. This communication was ratified by the fuel administration, and was approved by and filed with the state *52comptroller. On or about April 9, 1918, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Penn Collieries Co. v. . McKeeverNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Taylor Laundry Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. American Laundry MacHinery Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Marchant v. National Reserve Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- M. L. Improvement Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1922
- Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.