Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brush-Moore Newspapers, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1971No. 70-295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.

The issue presented in this cause is whether plaintiff is entitled to amend his petition by sub*113stituting WONE, Inc., as party defendant in place of Brush-Moore Newspapers, Inc., d. b. a. WONE Radio Station.

We note at the outset that plaintiff in fact instituted his action against the wrong corporate party, as Brush-Moore neither owned nor operated the radio station. In addition, we note that if plaintiff cannot amend the petition as he requests, then his failure to name WONE, Inc., as defendant will result in loss of his cause of action due to the running of the statute of limitations (R. 0.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maloney v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Likover v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Robinson v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Rickenbacker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Adams v. Winkler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KrohnCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API