Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

(PC) Giles v. Sacramento County D. A.'s Office

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 27, 2023No. 2:23-cv-01334Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER GILES, No. 2:23-cv-1334 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff filed a complaint but failed to 18 pay the court’s filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On August 1, 2023, 19 plaintiff was granted leave to remedy such deficiency; on August 10, 2023, plaintiff filed an 20 application to proceed in forma pauperis and trust account…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API