State v. Skinner

KNOLL, Justice.

|, This criminal case comes to us in a pretrial posture after the lower courts denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence the State seized purportedly pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum as provided in La.Code Crim. Proc. art. 66. Defendant is charged with violating La. Rev.Stat. 40:971 B(l)(i), obtaining a prescription for a controlled dangerous substance from a health care practitioner without disclosing the fact of an existing prescription for a controlled dangerous substance from another health care prac titioner, ie., “doctor shopping”. Upon receiving information…