Legal Opinion
Ray v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 2005No. 04CA2261PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHawthorne, J.
Claimant, Carnell Ray, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) determining that the computation of his average weekly wage (AWW) should not include the cost of health insurance because he did not actually pay to continue coverage after his employment was terminated. We set the order aside and remand for further proceedings.
Claimant suffered serious head injuries in October 2001 as a result of a work-related automobile accident, and New World Van Lines of Colorado (employer) filed a general admission of liability for temporary total disability benefits.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Davison v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Kern v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- County Workers Compensation Pool v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Dillabaugh v. EllertonColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Zerba v. Dillon CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Town of Castle Rock & Cirsa v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kieckhafer v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.