Legal Opinion

In Re Silica Products Liability Litigation

Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided November 10, 2004No. 04-0606PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REVIEW BY THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL

Since Rule 13 took effect last year, 453 plaintiffs have filed 71 lawsuits involving 158 defendants, alleging injurious exposure to silica. The suits are pending in 55 district courts in 20 counties. Six defendants in these cases have filed a motion asking this panel to appoint a pretrial judge pursuant to Rule 13.1 The motion is opposed by all the plaintiffs and by 11 defendants. For the reasons stated in this opinion, a majority of the panel has granted the motion and appointed a pretrial judge by separate order issued this date.

Rule 13…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Hurricane Rita Evacuation Bus FireUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006
  2. In Re Ad Valorem Tax LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006
  3. In Re Texas Windstorm Insurance Ass'n Hurricanes Rita & Humberto LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
  4. In Re Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Mortgage Servicing LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
  5. In Re Deep South Crane & Rigging Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API