In Re Ad Valorem Tax Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court 1
ON REVIEW BY THE MULTIDIS-TRICT LITIGATION PANEL
2Opinion of the Court · PeeplesJustice Peeples
Rule 13 authorizes this MDL panel to transfer “related” cases from different trial courts to a single pretrial judge if transfer will (1) serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and (2) promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 13.3. Several companies in the Valero corporate family (Valero) have asked the panel to assign one judge to handle the pretrial phase of numerous ad valorem tax suits. Valero has challenged the valuation of its refineries, pipelines, terminals, and convenience stores by…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Silica Products Liability LitigationTexas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
- Union Carbide v. AdamsTexas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2003
- Haney v. Cooke County Tax Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by38 opinions
- In Re Cano Petroleum, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
- In Re Texas Windstorm Insurance Ass'n Hurricanes Rita & Humberto LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
- Valerus Compression Services v. Gregg County Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- In re Digitek® LitigationTexas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
- in Re: Champion Industrial Sales, Llc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.