Legal Opinion

In Re FISCHER

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

The appellant filed his application in the United States Patent Office on November 8, 1919, for a patent on an alleged improvement in “air, moisture, and sound-proof structure and method of and adhesive material for. producing the same.” Included in the application were an unnecessary and troublesome multiplicity of claims. The Examiner allowed certain of the claims and disallowed others. The Board of Appeals allowed certain other claims and modified the decision of the Examiner to some extent. The appellant has appealed to this court upon the rejection of claims 3, 5,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. In re GreenfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Richard A. Ward and Robert C. SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. In re McIntoshCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Application of Kenneth F. McIntoshCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Samuel Storchheim v. T. Stevens DaughertyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API