Legal Opinion
Robbins v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 9, 1935No. 30,410PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 262 N.W. 210, 872. Defendant appeals from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff. There was a motion for a directed verdict and a motion, after trial, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. There was no motion for a new trial. There were a number of special questions submitted to and answered by the jury, in addition to the general verdict.
There being no motion for a new trial, the review here is limited to a consideration of whether there is any evidence reasonably sufficient to sustain the verdict. International Harv. Co. v. National B. I. Co. 184 Minn. 548, 239 N.W. 663;…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Insurance Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Schaedler v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Brown v. State Automobile Insurance Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Roeder v. North American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.