Legal Opinion

Smith v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1950No. A-2345PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood

This controversy, as now before us, is a so-called new trial proceeding under Rule of Civil Procedure 329, by petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, who were defendants cited by publication and not personally appearing in the original proceeding. The latter was a suit by United Gas Pipe Line Company, respondent here, for partition of two tracts of twenty acres and one acre respectively and the minerals under both; the defendants being the six other co-owners, among whom petitioner, Mrs. Smith, held much the largest interest, which, however, was not greatly in excess of that held by the plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Texas Power & Light Co. v. HeringTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Corzelius v. OliverTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Cragin v. Henderson County Oil Development Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Wiseman v. CottinghamTexas Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bolstad v. EglesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Circle Y of Yoakum v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Pritchett v. Highway Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Mikell v. La BethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. City of Corpus Christi v. PolasekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API