Legal Opinion

De Wyrall v. McNamara

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The petitioner, a former employee of the I. R. T. subway system, was, upon transit unification, continued in the city’s employ, pursuant to chapter 927 of the Laws of 1939 (Wicks Law); he was classified and placed in the noncompetitive class, in the title of assistant supervisor (Structures). The city, through transit unification, acquired the properties of the B. M. T. and I. R. T. subways systems in June, 1940. After study of petitioner’s qualifications and each employee covered into city service, the respondent municipal civil service com*326mission by special resolution adopted January…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thoma v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Otis v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Foy v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API