Legal Opinion

Otis v. Board of Higher Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The petitioner in this proceeding and in each of the three companion applications, full professors at the City College of the City of New York and at the Brooklyn College, contend that chapter 403 of the Laws of 1943, now section 3104 of the Education Law, and known as the “ Moffat Law ”, entitles them to the annual increments provided for full professors under said law, commencing as of January 1, 1944, and in consequence they are entitled to receive as six annual mandatory increments the following amounts: $100, $300, $300, $300, $250, $250, totaling $1,500, and they each seek an order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. De Wyrall v. McNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wildey v. McElligottNew York Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  2. Blaine Personnel, Inc. v. Raymond Lee Organization, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. Board of Higher Education v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Board of Higher Education v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API