Legal Opinion

Hunt Drug Co. v. Hubert

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 16, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover for damage to a sidewalk clock and to an electric sign thereon caused by the superstructure of the defendant's barrel truck striking the *196clock. The base of the clock, which with the framework weighed about seventeen hundred pounds, was of cast iron riveted into a cement block which was set into the sidewalk near the curb in front of premises occupied by the plaintiff as a drug store.

The case was heard upon the report of an auditor without other evidence. The auditor found subsidiary facts, presumably justified by evidence before him, and also made a general…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Ballou v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Lowe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  4. Watriss v. First National Bank of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Percival v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. United Electric Light Co. v. Deliso Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Moroni v. BrawdersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Bern v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Copithorn v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API