Legal Opinion

Suratwala v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, dated March 26, 1986, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for several area variances, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated July 14, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s arguments, we find that the determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay is supported by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Iannucci v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Stein v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Paniccia v. VolkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Bennett v. Board of Review of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Matter of Troy Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Levine v. KormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API