Legal Opinion

Iannucci v. Casey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In August 1985 the petitioner purchased three contiguous lots, located in a class E residential district, on the northern side of Devine Avenue in Syosset, New York. This property has a total area of 10,658 square feet, and is currently improved with a two-story frame dwelling. The petitioner now seeks an area variance so as to permit the construction of a second house on his property. Under existing law, no building in a class E residential district may be constructed on a lot less than 6,000 square feet in size. Thus, without an area variance, the petitioner may not subdivide his property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Human Development Services of Port Chester, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Village of Port ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Townwide Properties, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. ValenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Kransteuber v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Graziano v. ScalafaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Lakeland Park Estates, Inc. v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API