Legal Opinion

Richard Carroll III v. Federal Express Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1997No. 95-16603PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Federal Express Corporation (“Federal Express”) fired Richard Carroll III (“Carroll”) from his job as a courier after he tested positive for using cocaine following a random drug test required by Department of Transportation (“DOT”) regulations, 49 C.F.R. §§ 391.109, 391.111 (“DOT regulations”). Carroll sued Federal Express alleging constitutional and state law claims arising out of his termination. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Carroll denies ever having used cocaine. He contends his testing positive on a drug test administered by an independent contractor,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bagdadi v. NazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Maloney v. RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. TRW, INC. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Phillips v. Quality Terminal Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. Robinson v. City of San Bernardino Police DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. McCrary v. El Paso Energy Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2002
  5. Brub v. CW Holdings, LLCSuperior Court of Guam · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API