Legal Opinion
Otero v. Cablevision
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Vaughan, J.
Plaintiff Norberto Otero moves for partial summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against the defendants. Defendants Neiss Management Corporation (Neiss) and 82 Rockaway Limited Liability Company (82 Rock-away) cross-move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims or, in the alternative, summary judgment granting their cross claims for common-law indemnification from defendant Cablevision of New York (Cablevision).
On December 16, 1997, plaintiff suffered injuries as the result of a fall that occurred while…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De Oliveira v. Little John's Moving Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Otero v. Cablevision of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Abbatiello v. Lancaster Studio AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 2001