Legal Opinion
Otero v. Cablevision of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 9, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff was an employee of Mucip, Inc., a subcontractor retained by the defendant Cablevision of New York (hereinafter Cablevision) to install and provide cable television service to its subscribers. On December 16, 1997, the plaintiff was *633installing a cable to the apartment of a tenant in a multiple dwelling owned and managed by the defendants 82 Rockaway LLC and Neiss Management Corp. respectively (hereinafter collectively the Building). The plaintiff was performing his work at the direction of Cablevision in response to a request made directly by the tenant. The Building claimed that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooper v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pineda v. 79 Barrow Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Abbatiello v. Lancaster Studio AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Williams v. LeChaseNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- Daniels v. Bohn/Fiore, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002