Legal Opinion

Yuhaszv v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 7, 1940No. 6954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant denies liability on the ground that Fourchy was without authority to modify the plans and thereby increase-the costs of construction; that if any changes involving additional cost either of material or labor were made, they were unauthorized.

The contract was in writing. Articles 3 and 5 read as follows:

“Article 3. Changes. — The contracting, officer may at any time, by a written order, and without notice to the sureties, make changes in the drawings and (or) specifications of this contract and within the general; scope thereof. If such changes cause an. increase…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. McMullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Fulmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
  4. United States ex rel. T. M. Page Corp. v. HenslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  5. Blair v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API