Legal Opinion
McComb v. Goldblatt Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 3, 1948No. 9348, 9349PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
This cause first came here in 1942, Walling v. Goldblatt Bros., 128 F.2d 778, when we reversed the judgment of the District Court, entered at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, finding that defendant’s employees there involved were not within the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., and directed the trial court to hear defendant’s evidence upon its claims that its employees were exempt. Thereafter, on January 12, 1944, some four years after the original suit was instituted, plaintiff amended its petition, averring that certain…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- McComb v. Homeworkers' Handicraft CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Robert J. Cleary, by His Father and Next Friend, Mike Cleary, Sr. v. Indiana Beach, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. HarangDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.