Legal Opinion

Tidewater v. Freight Drivers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 29, 1963No. [No. 139, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

230 Md. 450 (1963)

187 A.2d 685

TIDEWATER EXPRESS LINES, INC.

v.

FREIGHT DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 557

[No. 139, September Term, 1962.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 29, 1963.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.

James H. Doherty, with whom was H.B. Mutter on the brief, for appellant.

Bernard W. Rubenstein, with whom was Jacob J. Edelman on the brief, for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · HammondHammond, J.

This is an appeal by Tidewater Express Lines, Inc., an employer, whose bill of complaint against a union, Freight Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 557, to enjoin…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue) v. General Electric Company (Telechron Department, Ashland, Massachusetts)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  4. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America, Atlantic and Gulf District, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. General Electric Co. v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft, & Agricultural Implement WorkersOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API