Legal Opinion
McGregor v. Schmidt
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 24, 1973No. 72-C-344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This is a civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (3) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff is presently confined in the Wisconsin State Prison; that plaintiff has been deprived of due process at his appearances before the parole board; that under Wis.Stats. § 57.06(2) (1969), more rigorous eligibility standards for parole apply to inmates not committed under the sex offender act…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hughes Anderson Bagley v. J.J. Harvey, U.S. Marshal, and Audrey Kaslow, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Pelland v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Paulus v. FentonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Safeguard Mut. Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Schultz v. USADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995