Legal Opinion
Paulus v. Fenton
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 27, 1977No. Civ. 76-1272PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, Chief Judge.
Petitioner was until recently confined at the United States Penitentiary in Lewis-burg, Pennsylvania. He had filed this habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 pro se, but has recently obtained counsel. Since petitioner’s release from confinement, and while this action has been pending, he has been in a special and highly unusual form of custody, and is required to remain in this state pending the outcome of this action. 1 In this petition he argues that the failure of the respondents to formulate a plan other than one requiring him to take up residence in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Soloway v. WegerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- McGregor v. SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hughes Anderson Bagley v. J.J. Harvey, U.S. Marshal, and Audrey Kaslow, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Lines v. WargoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Housler v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Kirk v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
- RODGERS v. MEEKSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.