Legal Opinion

Pelland v. Rhode Island

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided May 7, 2004No. C.A. 01-454SPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

SMITH, District Judge.

The right to travel from state to state, though not explicitly guaranteed by the United States Constitution, has long been recognized as a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. In this case, a convicted sex offender on probation seeks greater freedom of movement than the State of Rhode Island is willing to allow him. The question for this Court is whether Rhode Island’s enforcement of a policy that curtails the right of sex offender probationers to travel interstate violates the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Willy LevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. Goings v. Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Pelland v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Perfect Puppy, Inc. v. City of East ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2015
  5. Jane Doe v. City of ElizabethDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API