Legal Opinion

Ayers v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1940No. 28246PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was brought under the declaratory judgment act (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 784-1 [P. C. § 8108-21] et seq., Laws of 1935, chapter 113, p. 305, as amended by Laws of 1937, chapter 14, p. 39), by Warren E. Ayers, an employee of defendant city of Tacoma, eligible to become a member of the city’s pension system. The action was brought by plaintiff in his own behalf, and as a representative of eight hundred seventy-two other employees similarly situated, to determine the validity and constitutionality of a pension ordinance of the city. Thomas A. Swayze, as controller, C. Val Fawcett,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Byrd v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. United States v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. People ex rel. Kroner v. AbbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Walker v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bowler v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Lynch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Heinsma v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. INTER. ASS'N OF FIRE. v. Spokane AirportsWashington Supreme Court · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API