Roethlisberger v. McNulty
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gibbons, J.:
Appellant moved for a change of venue pursuant to NRS 13.040, based on residence, and NRS 13.050, based on convenience. When his motion was denied, he filed this appeal, arguing that none of the defendants reside in the county where the action is to be tried and that because the alleged events occurred in a different county, venue should be transferred there for reasons of convenience and justice. We conclude, however, that as venue was not improper as to appellant, he lacked standing to challenge venue based on his codefendant’s place of residence. Also, as to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURENevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Pratt v. RowlandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Mitchell v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Allen-Fleming Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mountain View Recreation, Inc. v. Imperial Commercial Cooking Equipment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013