Legal Opinion

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Lane

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1978PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

Defendants, employer and its workmen’s compensation insurer, appeal from the trial court’s award of benefits that included a ten percent permanent partial disability to employee’s foot. Defendants challenge the competency of the medical evidence, consisting solely of the deposition of Dr. Gary *349McAllister, relied upon in finding the permanent partial disability. The only issue is whether the physician’s testimony on the question of permanence attained the degree of certainty sufficient to sustain an award of permanent disability.

Plaintiff was working as a material handler…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Tennessee Dickel Distilling CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  2. P & L Const. Co., Inc. v. LankfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Milstead v. KaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lynch v. La RueTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Central Motor Express, Inc. v. BurneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Tindall v. Waring Park Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lyle v. Exxon Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Patterson v. Rockwell InternationalTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API