Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1915No. 19149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

From a conviction of the crime of robbery, in the district court for Lancaster county, the defendant has prosecuted error to this court.

The brief of plaintiff in error, who will be designated as defendant, assigns 12 errors. The first nine assignments relate to the rulings of the court in the admission and exclusion of evidence. When the questions and answers referred to in these assignments are taken in connection with their context, it becomes apparent that no prejudicial error, if any at all, was committed.

The ninth assignment assails the ruling of the court in sustaining a motion to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Polin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Lawhead v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Langford v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Nightingale v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haswell v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Westbrook v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ruzicka v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API