Langford v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Dakota county. Tried below before Norris, J. as to the indorsement of names on information: Parks v. State, 20 Neb., 517; People v. Evans, 40 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 473; People v. Quick, 25 Id., 302; Gandy v. State, 27 Neb., 707. As to the separation of the jury: People v. Evans, 40 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 476; Churchill v. Judge, 23 Id., 212; Cantwell v. State, 18 O. St., 482. As to the 3d instruction: Cowan v. State, 22 Neb., 519.
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
The prisoners in error, Phineas Langford and George Cassman, were charged by the information of the county attorney, in the district court of said county, under sec. 13, chap. 4, of the Criminal Code of this state, entitled “Robbery,” with unlawfully and forcibly, on February 18, 1890, in the town of Covington, in said county, assaulting C. P. Hendrickson, and by force and violence took and stole from his person seventeen dollars in gold and silver coin of the United States. On the day of bringing this information into court, February 24, 1890, copies were served on the prisoners.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Ferguson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Lawhead v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Whitney v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.