Legal Opinion
Louise TAYLOR, Executrix for the Estate of Jerry Taylor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CANTEEN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 30, 1995No. 95-1107PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Jerry Taylor filed suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, after he lost his job as a maintenance supervisor in the vending division at the Canteen Corporation (“Canteen”). He also brought a supplemental Illinois state law claim against Canteen alleging intentional breach of an oral employment contract. The district court granted Canteen’s motion for summary judgment on both claims and Taylor, represented by the executrix of his estate, appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court in part…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- William Radue v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Roosevelt Burrell v. Marvin PowersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Curtis Sauzek and Julian Koski v. Exxon Coal Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Carole M. HARTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISCONSIN BELL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.