Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Richitelli

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2003No. 203PA02PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

Plaintiff Karen McKinney, acting individually and as the personal representative of the estate of her deceased son, Michael Edward McKinney 1 (Michael), brought this declaratory action against Michael’s father, James Everett Richitelli (defendant), to determine the rights of the parties with respect to any proceeds of Michael’s estate and to any proceeds of a wrongful death action brought on Michael’s behalf. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse the decision of the Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. In Re YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LunsfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Morris v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Sawyers v. Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API