Legal Opinion

Becker v. Federal Election Commission

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 1, 2000No. 00-2124PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Presidential candidate Ralph Nader and others assert that the prohibition in the Federal Election Campaign Act on the use of corporate money “in connection with” federal elections invalidates certain Federal Election Commission regulations governing the funding of presidential debates. Those regulations permit corporations to make contributions from their general treasuries to qualified nonprofit, nonpartisan organizations staging federal candidate debates. Suit was brought in anticipation of the debates to be staged by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) before…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Focus on the Family v. Pinellas Suncoast Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Steir v. Girl Scouts of the USACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Nova Health Systems v. FogartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API