Legal Opinion

Measles v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2011No. 2010-0393PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGee Brown, J.

{¶ 1} The Ohio Industrial Commission and the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“BWC”) appeal from a decision of the Eighth District Court of Appeals finding that plaintiffs-appellees’ claim for restitution under a contract for lump-sum advancement was a claim in equity, not law, and therefore could properly proceed before the common pleas court.

{¶ 2} We are asked to determine whether appellees’ claim for restitution sounds in equity or in law. If the claim is equitable, it may be brought in a court of common pleas. However, if the claim is a claim at law for money damages, the Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Ohio Academy of Nursing Homes v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cristino v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Cirino v. Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Cleveland v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Hulbert v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Barrow v. Vill. of New MiamiOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API