Legal Opinion

Veney v. Ojeda

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 15, 2004No. 1:03 CV 1410PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff brings claims of (i) illegal seizure and excessive use of force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants F.J. Ojeda and Earl Jones, officers of the Leesburg, Virginia Police Department and (ii) assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false arrest under Virginia common law solely against defendant Jones. Defendants seek summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., on the grounds (i) that defendants are entitled to qualified immunity and (ii) that on the basis of undisputed facts, defendant…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. Loudon County School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  2. Ware v. James City County, VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  3. Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Glass v. Anne Arundel CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  5. Guerrero v. DeaneDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API