Legal Opinion
Zarbell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1958No. 34411PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
The plaintiff, Mary Frances Zarbell, attempted to gain jurisdiction of the defendant Bank of America, a national banking corporation domiciled at San Francisco, California, by an in rem garnishment on a debtor *550of the bank, the Alaska Freight Lines, Inc., which is doing business in this state.
The summons and complaint were filed in the superior court of King county and the writ of garnishment was thereafter issued. The complaint was served on the defendant bank in California.
The defendant appeared and filed a motion entitled “Special Appearance and Motion to Quash and Dismiss,” wherein it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burdette v. CorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Teater v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Bain v. ThomsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Monarch Wine Co. v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Crofoot v. GianniniNew York Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Zarbell v. BK. OF AMERICA ETC. ASS'NWashington Supreme Court · 1958