Legal Opinion
Keith David Nizwantowski v. Monarch, et al.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 20, 2026No. 5:26-cv-00031Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:26-CV-31-BO KEITH DAVID NIZWANTOWSKI, Plaintiff, . ORDER MONARCH, et al., Defendant. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, [DE- 2, -10], motions to amend the complaint, [DE-9, -20], motion for expedited review of the in forma pauperis application, [DE-17], and for frivolity review of the complaint, [DE-1], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons that follow, the motions to amend, [DE-9, -20], are allowed in order to allow Plaintiff to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.